As Sr. Evelyn has pointed out, Our Children, Our Church represents a very
significant progression from the principles and procedures outlined in the 1996
guidelines, and the Good
Practice Guidelines published in 2003.
As you can see from the diagram attached and being displayed in the presentation,
the structures in both 1996 and 2003 were largely based around the operational
independence of each diocese and religious congregation. The Framework Document
encouraged each Bishop to establish an advisory panel, to assign a delegate to
receive and handle allegations of child sexual abuse and to train and appoint
support persons for both the complainant and the accused. CORI and the IMU had
developed their own parallel structures based on similar principles. These
relatively independent structures were supported by a National Child Protection
Office of the Irish Episcopal Conference and a National Child Protection Office
for CORI respectively.
A critical development in Our Children, Our Church is the progression to
a one Church approach to all aspects of policy and procedure in relation to
child protection. All of the sponsoring bodies represented here today have
approved this policy and remain committed to implementing it all levels of
the Church in Ireland. As the next diagram will show, the sponsoring bodies
will now share and fund the same structure.
The body with overall responsibility for ensuring the uniform implementation
of the policies within this new structure is the National Board, already mentioned
by Archbishop Brady. The functions of this Board are listed in pages 11 and 12
of the document. Critically, the Board will carry out an annual audit (see 2.7,
page 17) of the implementation of the policies and procedures contained in the
document at every level of the Church. It will also publish the results of this
audit, thereby providing the Church community, the statutory authorities and
the general public with a new level of transparency in terms of the Church’s
commitment to best practice in child protection.
Importantly, the National Board will also publish national statistics in relation
to child abuse involving Church personnel, thereby ensuring consistency of
criteria for such statistics and providing further levels of transparency.
As Sr Evelyn has explained, the National Board will in turn establish a single
National Office for Child Protection, with a Chief Executive and supporting
staff, to replace the two existing offices operated by CORI and the Irish
Episcopal Conference.
One of the first tasks of the Board will be to introduce a new concept into
the existing structure for child protection known as the ‘Collaborative Unit’.
Depending on the size and geographical location of a given diocese or religious
congregation, a collaborative unit will comprise of a number of dioceses and
or religious congregations in a given area, or in the case of larger dioceses
and congregations, a single diocese or congregation with a large population
or large geographical spread. The precise number of ‘Collaborative Units’ will
be decided by the National Board.
Each Collaborative Unit will have a Child Protection Management Group made up
of professionals who can provide appropriate advice and support to individual
bishops and religious superiors and which will monitor the overall response
to allegations and suspicions of child abuse within each Collaborative Unit.
Each Collaborative Unit will also have assigned to it a professionally
qualified Director of Child Protection. This person, who replaces the delegate
in the 1996 structures, will play a critical role in terms of receiving
allegations and reporting allegations and suspicions of child abuse to the
civil authorities. As section 8 of the document explains, ‘All allegations of
child abuse against Church personnel shall be reported without delay to the
Church’s Director of Child Protection’ and ‘where it is established that there
are reasonable grounds for concern that child abuse has occurred’, the threshold
proposed by the state guidelines Children First, ‘the Director of Child
Protection shall, on behalf of the bishop or religious superior… report the
allegation to the civil authorities immediately.’
Critically, Our Children, Our Church ensures that the decision about
to how to proceed with an allegation or suspicion of child abuse is made by
a professionally qualified person with experience in this field rather than
by the bishop or religious superior. While the principle of informing the
bishop about the allegation is accepted in the document, the policy recognises
the moral, professional and statutory obligation on the Director of Child
Protection to report an allegation or suspicion of child abuse to the civil
authorities, irrespective of the opinion of any other person about the case,
including the bishop or religious superior.
The other functions of the Director of Child Protection are outlined in section
2.3.3 of the document and include liaising with the civil authorities and
ensuring that they are involved with appropriate speed and in all stages of
the management of a particular case. Again, this is to anticipate the kind
of inter-agency cooperation that has since been proposed by the Ferns Report.
The policy also obliges each parish and Church organisation to display the
name and contact number of the Director of Child Protection in a prominent
and easily accessible place. This is an expression of our commitment to
encouraging all of those with suspicions or concerns to come forward and
have those concerns reported to the civil authorities.
At the level of each Diocese or Religious Congregation, each Bishop and
Religious Superior will have available to her or him a Child Protection
Committee which will support the Bishop or Superior in ensuring that
information about child protection is readily accessible in parishes and
Church organisations and that referrals are made promptly to the Director
of Child Protection. This Child Protection Committee will also be responsible
for ensuring the planning and delivery of training in child protection at a
Diocesan/ Congregational and Parish level, including the training of the
Parish Child Protection Representative. This is the person who, at a parish
level, will be appointed to promote awareness of the Church’s child protection
policies and ensure that the public has ready access to the contact details
for the Director of Child Protection.
I would now like to ask Mrs Kay Hayden, National Director of Training for
the Child Protection Office of the Bishops’ Conference, to briefly outline
some of the developments which have taken place in recent years in respect
of training Church personnel in child safety and protection.
ends
19 December 2005
|
|